CalgaryBluenote
Verified Trader,
Now that this product has been out for a few days I am curious to hear what everyone thinks about this year's CFL card set. I think we all agree that we are disappointed with the changes/deletions in the final checklist relative to their sales sheet and the previous year's products.
Here are my thoughts:
Positives:
1. As with Upper Deck Series 1 hockey overall the game action photography is top notch.
2. The horizontal design of the Game Jersey/Patches looks really sharp and a number of the patches I've seen so far are multi-coloured and not simply single coloured.
3. The four boxes I've opened have beaten the stated odds on the box. In the four boxes I opened I received six game jerseys, one game patch, one Helmet Logo Patch and two autographs.
Negatives:
1. The posed photography for the players that changed teams over the off-season are way too dark. It's particularly difficult to make out who the player is if they are wearing their helmet.
2. I don't like the Retro design, particularly the glossy finish. Retro cards should have a matte finish. It's too bad they couldn't use some of the 1950's/60's OPC/Topps designs like Topps does in Topps Heritage baseball.
3. Dropping the rookie redemption card is a big mistake. Rookie cards drive all sports-card products and I assume the CFL product is no different.
Finally, I'm not sure what to think about the auto parallel cards. Would collectors prefer this type of autograph set or a stand alone autograph insert set like CFL Script/Marks?
Here are my thoughts:
Positives:
1. As with Upper Deck Series 1 hockey overall the game action photography is top notch.
2. The horizontal design of the Game Jersey/Patches looks really sharp and a number of the patches I've seen so far are multi-coloured and not simply single coloured.
3. The four boxes I've opened have beaten the stated odds on the box. In the four boxes I opened I received six game jerseys, one game patch, one Helmet Logo Patch and two autographs.
Negatives:
1. The posed photography for the players that changed teams over the off-season are way too dark. It's particularly difficult to make out who the player is if they are wearing their helmet.
2. I don't like the Retro design, particularly the glossy finish. Retro cards should have a matte finish. It's too bad they couldn't use some of the 1950's/60's OPC/Topps designs like Topps does in Topps Heritage baseball.
3. Dropping the rookie redemption card is a big mistake. Rookie cards drive all sports-card products and I assume the CFL product is no different.
Finally, I'm not sure what to think about the auto parallel cards. Would collectors prefer this type of autograph set or a stand alone autograph insert set like CFL Script/Marks?
Last edited: