Best Hockey Card Rookie Class Ever...90-91 or 05-06??

What is the very best hockey card rookie class ever?

  • 90-91 Rookie Class

    Votes: 69 50.7%
  • 05-06 Rookie Class

    Votes: 53 39.0%
  • Some other Rookie Class

    Votes: 14 10.3%

  • Total voters
    136

Rorschach

New Member, Must Send First
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
1,104
Reaction score
0
Location
Arcadia, CA
Please only vote if you know the classes of both...feel free to research it!

So every year we get new rookies in the NHL but anyone who has collected cards for more than five minutes knows that what players actually play and what players actually have cards are two very different things.

Some hype guys get cards ASAP and some guys get their card the next year if they get a late call up and had minimal hype. Our Jonathan Quick is a guy like that, he has no Young Guns RC at all and only has RCs in late products. Not sure why they (UD) just didn't make him a holdover rookie for next year's products... There are multiple reasons for why a guy gets a card and what year he first appears...

This thread/poll is about rookie classes that all appeared on official NHL cardboard in one year. (No Classic Games for 90-91 or ITG H&P for 05-06. ) In other words, had the best crop of RCs in one hockey card season. In my mind there are only two...


So in my somewhat-educated opinion, there two rookie card classes that stand head, shoulders, torso and belly button above all other years:
90-91 and 05-06.
(The sick thing is that both of those years, the year after was also very deep...)


In my estimation, both sets are supported by incredibly deep drafts and contain multiple years' worth of actual NHL rookies.

90-91
90-91 had guys from the 89-90 NHL rookie class, breaking Topps' tradition of only giving a guy a card 99% of the time after playing a full season or two; many of these top rookies came from the 1988 draft. It also was supported by 1989 draft, including top players like Mats Sundin. And of course this was the first year companies put out cards of players just drafted that year, the incredibly deep and amazing 1990 draft. Then UD upped the ante by releasing the Team Canada's World Junior Championship team, so that for the first time, even star players who hadn't even qualified for the draft got cards. Scott Niedermayer, anyone? Three waves of Russians fleeing the Soviet Union for North American NHL hockey appeared in the sets as well...first came the old HOFers like Makarov and Larionov, then came the elite youngsters like Mogilny first and then Fedorov, and lastly more talented Russians came. Guys who weren't elite but found a degree of stardom in the NHL, like Arturs Irbe. All of that crammed into one years' worth of sets!

05-06
Then you have the 05-06 class which just about every collector knows. We have a crazy deep, even more ridiculous than 1990, draft in 2003...the first four picks had cards already along with a few other standouts like Dustin Brown, but the vast majority of future all-stars all got their first cards in 05-06. Then you have the 2004 draft headed by two franchise players and of course the infamous 2005 Crosby lottery. Where as many of the talent pools the 90-91 class draws on have a bunch of players but not necessarily quality players, this class seems to draw heavily on a limited bunch of very talented guys.




Go ahead and vote. But before you do, try this fun exercise. Take the RCs from 90-91 and make a whole All-Star team out of it...four forward lines, preferably the 4th line is epic role players, not just more scorers that are less talented than the guys on the first three lines. Then assemble a seven man defense corps made up of three pairs and spare guy. And of course pick your top three goalies.

Do the same for the 05-06 class.

Then imagine them playing head to head...who wins in 7? Vote for that team in the poll. :D



Post your teams here and I'll post my teams later tomorrow.

- R
.><.
 
Last edited:
I'd give 90-91 the vote simply on the sheer number of unique players earning RCs, but when the quality of some of those players is considered, it makes even further sense.
 
90-91 every day, twice on Sunday.

Consider this troupe of lines:

Fedorov-mogilny-bure
Roenick-modano-Jagr
Brindamour-Sundin-bondra
Domi-Primeau-Recchi

Add
Blake-Fetisov
Sydor-Galley
Schneider-Numminen


And in goal
Brodeur-Belfour

What does it say about your team when you don't even have roster spots for Keane, Ricci, Richter, Joseph, Nolan, Larionov, quintal, Sweeney, beukaboom, desjardins, wilkinson, king...
 
Amazing 90-91 team! Here is my take on 05-06 team, might be forgetting someone

Ovechkin-Crosby-Parise
Perry-Getzlaf-Vanek
Carter-Richards-Filppula
Franzen-Koivu-Clowe

Steen,Kostitsyn,Jokinen,Fleischmann,Talbot

Keith-Suter
Phaneuf-Seabrook
Whitney-Meszaros
Coburn

Ballard,Wideman

Lundqvist
Rinne

Ward,Howard

Not too shabby either
 
Last edited:
Amazing 90-91 team! Here is my take on 05-06 team, might be forgetting someone

Ovechkin-Crosby-Parise
Perry-Getzlaf-Vanek
Carter-Richards-Filppula
Franzen-Koivu-Clowe

Steen,Kostitsyn,Jokinen,Fleischmann,Talbot

Keith-Suter
Phaneuf-Seabrook
Whitney-Meszaros
Coburn

Ballard,Wideman

Lundqvist
Rinne

Ward,Howard

Not too shabby either

Boogaard for Franzen and that 4th line is scary.

Great thread topic.
 
What does it say about your team when you don't even have roster spots for Keane, Ricci, Richter, Joseph, Nolan, Larionov, quintal, Sweeney, beukaboom, desjardins, wilkinson, king...

Or Lindros. I would switch out Primeau for Lindros. What is amazing about this "class" of rookies is that three of the top four all time wins leaders had rookie cards in this class. I agree on the 1990-91 class over the 2005-06 class.

This was the first year that I busted a box of hockey cards, so it does hold a special place in my collecting heart.

I do reserve the right to change my opinion in 15 years.
 
I vote for 90-91 as most the players played longer and I grew up watching them become stars
 
The reason I vote for 05-06 is because of the way more valuable cards. Give me one Crosby Cup RC, I'll give you ten full rookie sets from each of those 90-91 sets.

But if going by which one was more important, I'd say 90-91. 05-06 wasn't that special for collecting in my opinion (there was already way too many sets, sure, UD took over most of them, but still).
 
taking the dollars out of it, it has to be 90-91 in my opinion. That year did more for putting the hobby on the map then any other year. 05-06 just put the hobby out of reach of most collectors in my opinion.
 
90-91 was amazing. I would love to know if anyone has figured out the math on what the cards would be worth if they were not so massed produced.
 
Man you guys are young.

Lindsay*-Ted Kennedy*-Howe*
Doug Bentley*-Maurice Richard*- Harry Watson*
Mosienko*-Edgar Laprade*-Geoffrion*
Mosdell-Delvecchio*-Bert Olmstead*


D:
Harvey*-Kelly*
Tom Johnson*-Stanley*
Butch Bouchard*-Fern Flaman*
Bill Quackenbush*

G
Sawchuk*
Lumley*
Rayner*


1951-52 Parkhurst

* = 21 of 22 Hall of Famers

I win. Thread over. Get off my lawn! ;)

:devil:
 
Man you guys are young.

Lindsay*-Ted Kennedy*-Howe*
Doug Bentley*-Maurice Richard*- Harry Watson*
Mosienko*-Edgar Laprade*-Geoffrion*
Mosdell-Delvecchio*-Bert Olmstead*


D:
Harvey*-Kelly*
Tom Johnson*-Stanley*
Butch Bouchard*-Fern Flaman*
Bill Quackenbush*

G
Sawchuk*
Lumley*
Rayner*


1951-52 Parkhurst

* = 21 of 22 Hall of Famers

I win. Thread over. Get off my lawn! ;)

:devil:

:owned::owned::owned::owned::owned::owned:
Now where is Randy (Orca Pod), i am quite sure he is 100 years old and could prolly quote some obscure reference to the 1800s LOLOL
 
05/06 in terms of hobby dollars.
90/91 in terms of impact at the nhl level

This. I think it's a no-brainer going based only on rookie cards. I think it becomes interesting if you open it up to any and all cards of the players that fall within the criteria. I'd argue that the guys from the 90-91 rookie class are collected a little more religiously than the 05-06 class and I think a lot of it has to do with the ridiculous amount of cards now and the money needed to fund it all.
 
No love for 07-08, that was a pretty stellar class as well:

Kane
Toews
Backstrom
Price

And the second tier of:

Ryan
Lucic
Rask
Krecji
Callahan
Dubinsky
Johnson (E and J)
Perron
Gagner
Pavelec
Halak
Hiller

Thats a pretty damn good class as well.
 
This. I think it's a no-brainer going based only on rookie cards. I think it becomes interesting if you open it up to any and all cards of the players that fall within the criteria. I'd argue that the guys from the 90-91 rookie class are collected a little more religiously than the 05-06 class and I think a lot of it has to do with the ridiculous amount of cards now and the money needed to fund it all.

That is a keen observation.
 
exactly. OP has 2 different things going on here. the title asks which is the better hockey card rookie class not better rookie class.

It's simple. Best class of players "a rookie class" that appeared as RCs hockey cards "hockey card rookie class." But since I don't want to have to say or make people read "hcrc" over and over, and it's pretty much accepted generally if you clearly define what you're talking about early on in any piece of writing, you can use an abbreviated version of the same term later and still mean the same thing. It's a bit like what pronouns are for.
 
05/06 in terms of hobby dollars.
90/91 in terms of impact at the nhl level

I'm definitely not talking about dollars since I'm asking people to build teams to face off...

Also I disagree. For example OPC Premier was originally a dollar a pack. Jagr eventually went up to $50 in guide (now it's like 20 bucks but then again OPC Premier is like 25 cents per pack, lol). That's 50x the original price point. Of course Jagr's career has gone up and back down so the entire journey of the card has already come to pass where as Crosby's has not...the price is still near it's pinnacle.

Crosby at $8K is only 20x price point of the $400 for The Cup.
In other words, if Jagr had a /99 Cup RC, he'd be in theory $20K. In reality, though, those cards over the $2K amount all have resistance since very few collectors have the money to buy an 8K card where as all collectors nowadays can afford a 50 dollar card.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
390,142
Messages
2,238,828
Members
4,169
Latest member
Misso
Back
Top