bergy37
Verified Trader,
I just received my 2008-09 BAP Rookie Redemptions today. I was waiting to see which I was going to get - the cards as they were numbered on the back of the redemption cards I pulled or the cards corresponding to the card numbers that were listed when I redeemed the cards online (no they were not the same). Well, it turned out to be the second option which has me concerned that people didn't get what they were expecting. For example, I pulled a RED281 which should be Tavares according to the checklist released by Upper Deck (assuming RED281 equals RR-281). But, when I redeemed it, it said Rookie Redemption card #38. I contacted Upper Deck to try to clarify this but never received a reply. Well, it turns out that I didn't receive a Tavares but I did receive RR-318 Matt Pelech which is the 38th card in the checklist.
For the record, these are the cards I redeemed: RED281, RED284, RED288, RED288, RED291, RED291, RED292, RED294, RED295, RED296, RED296, RED299, RED303, RED307, RED316, RED316, RED319, RED320, RED321, RED322, RED324, RED328, RED328, RED330, RED334, RED338
And these are the cards I received: RR-283, RR-287, RR-287, RR-289, RR-290, RR-295, RR-296, RR-297, RR-297, RR-298, RR-299, RR-300, RR-307, RR-308, RR-308, RR-309, RR-309, RR-310, RR-311, RR-311, RR-318, RR-326, RR-327, RR-328, RR-329, RR-335
Did something similar happen to other people? Am I wrong to assume that redemption card RED281 should correspond to redeemed card RR-281? Am I misinterpreting this or did Upper Deck really screw up and going to have a lot of angry Tavares collectors (among others) on their hands?
Tom
For the record, these are the cards I redeemed: RED281, RED284, RED288, RED288, RED291, RED291, RED292, RED294, RED295, RED296, RED296, RED299, RED303, RED307, RED316, RED316, RED319, RED320, RED321, RED322, RED324, RED328, RED328, RED330, RED334, RED338
And these are the cards I received: RR-283, RR-287, RR-287, RR-289, RR-290, RR-295, RR-296, RR-297, RR-297, RR-298, RR-299, RR-300, RR-307, RR-308, RR-308, RR-309, RR-309, RR-310, RR-311, RR-311, RR-318, RR-326, RR-327, RR-328, RR-329, RR-335
Did something similar happen to other people? Am I wrong to assume that redemption card RED281 should correspond to redeemed card RR-281? Am I misinterpreting this or did Upper Deck really screw up and going to have a lot of angry Tavares collectors (among others) on their hands?
Tom