By No Demand: It's Pro Set Week

deepbluejacket

Verified Trader,
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
1,029
Reaction score
0
Location
Biddeford, ME
Why is it Pro Set week? Because I am finally putting all my 1990-91 Pro Set cards away. For years they have been piled up in the boxes they came in, largely unsorted. How many boxes? Forty eight. With more unopened, but let's leave them out of this. So if I'm putting them away, might as well talk about them, no matter where it leads.

If I follow through with this scheme, I'll post:
  • My favorite biographies from Series 1 and 2
  • A Case Break
  • Esoteric musings on player selection
  • An unhinged deep dive into a Series 2 oddity that unnerves even me
Fun, huh?

So let's start with one of my favorite games,

HOW OLD IS THIS PHOTO?!

For those who haven't played before, this set is famous for passing off old photography as new, reaching so far back as attempting to pass off an image from the 1982-83 season. Today's candidate is:



Brent Sutter, long term NYIslander, and well respected by his teammates. So respected in fact, that he is the captain of the team, as his biography informs us.



So where is his captain's "C"? Every other set from 1990-91 features it.



What about 1989-90?



Well, gee, this could take awhile. Let's go to hockey reference and find out when he became captain...1987-88?! Yes, indeed, Denis Potvin relinquished the captaincy and handed it to Sutter, who became the team's full time captain. So Pro Set's photo can't be any more recent than 1986-87.

Except, most captains don't become captain without an apprenticeship. Shouldn't he at least have an "A"?



Why yes, he does. There's no webpage that tracks assistant captaincy...we'll have to keep looking at cards. How about 1985-86? The Topps/OPC card is a headshot, but we do have a sticker and...son of a gun!



What about the '84-85 season?



Okay, no letter but gosh, he looks young. Too young. If this Pro Set photo were from the time before he assumed leadership, why does he no longer look like a kid?

There's something else wrong about this photo, and it's the boards. We can see Maple Leafs on the bench behind him, implying we are in Maple Leaf Gardens. And there's a Coke ad on the boards.

And that wouldn't be there in 1986.

So let's take a closer look at Sutter's equipment. The Vic stick and Supra pants are consistent with '86 or later, but what about the gloves? They are CCMs, but they don't match his gloves from the 1987-88 Topps card. No, they match the 1990-91 Topps card! And when I pull up a video of a Leafs game from 1989-90...there's a Coke ad in front of the bench!

Oh my. This photo is CURRENT! I don't know where the "C" is ... impossible jersey fold? Someone ripped it off in a scrap?...but this photo is quite probably from 1989-90, certainly no later than 1988-89. This entire exercise has been...insane?

Ah, Pro Set. This way madness lies.

Mike
 
Some interesting thoughts here.

If the shot was indeed from 1989-90, there were two possible dates for the Islanders to play in Toronto (January 10 and March 28, 1990) and Sutter was in action for both games.

The game summaries on NHL.com for either game do not list captains.

Perhaps a newspaper archive from this era might give an explanation as to why the "C" is missing. I know that Steve Babineau supplied many of the photos Pro Set used in the first set, but I believe that he also obtained some from other photographers as part of his deal with the company. I believe this was most likely taken by Graig Abel, who was the longtime team photographer for the Leafs. Getty isn't much of a help here, either, as the shots of Sutter in Toronto are from 1982, 1988, and 1991. He has the C in shots from 88 and 91.
 
There's also the shot on the back of his 1990-91 OPC Premier card - no "C" or "A"!

https://www.kronozio.com/card/e5b63...c/1991-92-O-Pee-Chee-Premier-Brent-Sutter-115

They list it as 1991-92, but it is obviously 1990-91.

Also, footage from the playoffs found here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYLpkh5yXWY) shows that Sutter was wearing the C when scoring a goal against the Rangers that year.

The picture on the back of the Premier card, however, is definitely a practice jersey. The material is more mesh-like than the gamers and, as you can see on the card below, the players didn't wear the A or C on those. Steen wore one of those letters in the years that surrounded this pic.

https://www.comc.com/Cards/Hockey/1992-93/O-Pee-Chee_-_Base/385/Thomas_Steen/167412/Graded/PSA/10
 

Forum statistics

Threads
389,473
Messages
2,232,890
Members
4,146
Latest member
E_Thom_Tech
Back
Top