Feedback Dilema (sp)

[DaveLefebvre]

Alrighty guys, here is my situation:

At the beginning of December I made a deal with a trader on here, now I am not going to put out his name right now, if he chooses to post here, so be it. Anyways, we made the deal at the beginning of December, and 3 weeks later I had no recieved, so I PM'ed him and asked if there was any delays etc, he says no, they were shipped when he said he shipped and that he didn't know what was wrong. So I said fine, slow mail, it happens. So yesterday, I open the mail box, and bam, the cards are here from this trader, curious, I check the postmark, it read January 6th 2005, now at this point, im pretty confused, I was told they were sent when they were supposed to be, maybe it was a RTS and he had to send again I thought, so I PM him and get this responce:

Sorry, I dont really know what to say. I got really backed up, then I paniced..... I started getting e-mails from people that I hadnt sent out for yet etc. I didnt want to turn into an Adam. I understand where your coming from and dont know what else to say.

So...Now my question:

Do I:
a) leave a positive feedback, got my cards afterall
b) Leave neutral feedback, I got my cards, but was lied to
c) Leave negative feedback because this is not how trading is supposed to be

Im leaning towards B, definatly not A, and a little to C...

Opinions welcome.
Dave

 

[jaywings19]

Dave - PM sent.

 

[Kharlamov17]

Definitly B, it would have been OK if he would have sent 1 week later, when he told but..your call.

Vic

EDIT: He/She didnt have a very good reason for not to send at the right point, in my opinium!

 

[quincy]

Jay contacted me this morning about the same trader. Wish I'd had an opportunity to PM you earlier in the day. Anyways, same advice holds - I suggest neutral feedback. You got the cards, but the other party didn't hold up his end very well.

 

[langway05]

Dave

Interesting dilemma!

I'd have to go along with the option of 'B'

However, he did attempt to make amends and explain his situation.

It's going to be your call in the end!

Brian

 

[will-411]

Sounds like a little wake up call is warranted - the neutral will do it but explain the nature of the neutral so it leaves it up to the person reading it to make an informed decision for themselves. Perhaps leaving a link to this thread instead of the transaction thread is in order.

Cory

 

[DaveLefebvre]

Thanks for the comments guys. Neutral is what I was leaning towards, and neutral is what I will give.

Quincy,
I'll toss you a PM in a sec.

Dave