So let me get this straight - just so I can understand this complete leap in logic.
1. These cards ARE stolen (although that hasn't been shown to be the case at all).
2. If these cards are stolen, no guilt and/or responsibility is to be brought down on the athlete or his management team for this theft (even though this appears to be where the likely breach took place).
3. The responsible party for these egregious crimes is the person who is currently in possession of the items and has such decided to sell them.
Does this sound like the wrong party is being held accountable for this "theft" to anyone else?
If theft is what is at stake here - which are the words that Dr Price used - then who stole the items? Start there and move forward. If you are unwilling to penalize the original "thief" then how can you hold the person who currently holds possession of the items responsible.
