Fred Bear
Verified Trader,
After reading through the post in the Hobby Talk area about why there seems to be so little love for vintage cards, I thought long and hard about why I don't collect more vintage cards... I love the 'vintage' feel of some of the new sets and am drawn to them (I debate doing the OPC 'retro' set each year) above all others. Even with the 'weak' hits and 'low return' on the RCs, I have more fun busting the packs and boxes that make me feel like it's 1984 again... LOL!
Well, now I'm older, wiser?, and preparing for a new year with several big life changes coming my way... I want to do something within my hobby that makes me happy and provides me the 'release' I need. I want to work on a set... a vintage set.
I've tried before, with little luck, because of many of the reasons that I outlined in my post in newfiecomicguy1's thread:
1) Interaction... I enjoy interacting with other collectors (this may seem contrary to some of the PMs I have responded to on offers for my cards). In taking up this endeavor, I don't have the luxury of an LCS stocked to the gills with vintage cards. I also don't have access to (or time for) weekly card show trips to shows which may or may not have vintage cards (let along vintage hockey cards).
The low activity levels in vintage forums, no LCS with vintage hockey, and low show access have discouraged my attempts in the past. I'm looking at this in a new light and with renewed passion.
2) Condition... If I've learned anything online, it's that what I call NM-MT and what others call NM-MT is not necessarily equal. I'm slowly learning to be ok (I say this with extreme hesitation) with getting a card as 'filler' until I can 'upgrade' it. Last year, I got a good price on an 1980-81 Topps Set which was in really nice shape. I've probably identified 50 cards that I want to replace (off-center, dinged corners, boxes rubbed off, etc.) with another 50 that are 'borderline'...
Again, I'm trying to keep a positive view on this and I'm assuming that this is what other vintage collectors do.
3) Counterfeits... I consider myself somewhat savvy, but vintage hockey is not an area where I have considerable experience. I'd like to think that I can tell a fake in person, but identifying the same fake in a scan (or even identifying a doctored image) is another story altogether.
I take the view that the dirt-bags are not as prevalent as it may seem and I'm not going to let this discourage me too much. I think the means exist to protect myself fairly well.
So, after my long-winded prelude, my questions are thus...
- Given the 'restrictions' that I have described, what are the pitfalls I need to avoid in working on a vintage set?
- When collecting a 'vintage' set, what are the pros and cons of graded cards? Is it worthwhile to put together an ungraded vintage set? Should I expect to get ungraded versions graded?
- Are there good references (both individuals on the forum and books in print) that I should seek out and talk to?
Thanks in advance for your help and advice!
** And just in case you were wondering, I am planning on working on piecing together the 1954-55 Topps hockey set. I currently have 0/60. **
Well, now I'm older, wiser?, and preparing for a new year with several big life changes coming my way... I want to do something within my hobby that makes me happy and provides me the 'release' I need. I want to work on a set... a vintage set.
I've tried before, with little luck, because of many of the reasons that I outlined in my post in newfiecomicguy1's thread:
1) Interaction... I enjoy interacting with other collectors (this may seem contrary to some of the PMs I have responded to on offers for my cards). In taking up this endeavor, I don't have the luxury of an LCS stocked to the gills with vintage cards. I also don't have access to (or time for) weekly card show trips to shows which may or may not have vintage cards (let along vintage hockey cards).
The low activity levels in vintage forums, no LCS with vintage hockey, and low show access have discouraged my attempts in the past. I'm looking at this in a new light and with renewed passion.
2) Condition... If I've learned anything online, it's that what I call NM-MT and what others call NM-MT is not necessarily equal. I'm slowly learning to be ok (I say this with extreme hesitation) with getting a card as 'filler' until I can 'upgrade' it. Last year, I got a good price on an 1980-81 Topps Set which was in really nice shape. I've probably identified 50 cards that I want to replace (off-center, dinged corners, boxes rubbed off, etc.) with another 50 that are 'borderline'...
Again, I'm trying to keep a positive view on this and I'm assuming that this is what other vintage collectors do.
3) Counterfeits... I consider myself somewhat savvy, but vintage hockey is not an area where I have considerable experience. I'd like to think that I can tell a fake in person, but identifying the same fake in a scan (or even identifying a doctored image) is another story altogether.
I take the view that the dirt-bags are not as prevalent as it may seem and I'm not going to let this discourage me too much. I think the means exist to protect myself fairly well.
So, after my long-winded prelude, my questions are thus...
- Given the 'restrictions' that I have described, what are the pitfalls I need to avoid in working on a vintage set?
- When collecting a 'vintage' set, what are the pros and cons of graded cards? Is it worthwhile to put together an ungraded vintage set? Should I expect to get ungraded versions graded?
- Are there good references (both individuals on the forum and books in print) that I should seek out and talk to?
Thanks in advance for your help and advice!
** And just in case you were wondering, I am planning on working on piecing together the 1954-55 Topps hockey set. I currently have 0/60. **