PSA miss cut question

[terrysawchuk]

Hi,

today i got my redemption for an Angus Campbell C56 PSA graded 6 from this years ITG Ultimate.

When i opened the letter i saw that it is graded PSA 6 (MC).

I am usually not a fan of these miss cut cards and am a little bit unhappy as the redemption told it is for a PSA 6 card.

Now the question.
Would you say PSA 6 (MC) is as good as a regular PSA 6 or worse?

I also would like to know if these miss cut cards count in the pop report.
Because there are only two others of this one which graded higher.
But i don`t know if they count the MC cards in this statistic.

I would be very thankfull for your answers.

 

[Fred Bear]

The PSA population report keeps qualified cards in a separate column, i.e. PSA 6 and PSA 6Q are different grades and populations.

'High-grade' qualified cards do not sell nearly as well as unqualified. In terms of the PSA registry, they are considered to be -2 grades from the base. Your PSA 6 (MC) would count as a PSA 4 in a registered C56 set.

 

[MMarch]

It is not "as good" as a regular PSA 6, however, still a nice card. If possible it would help to see a scan so we know how bad the cut is.

I am a little disapointed to see something like this, but even if it was a regular PSA 4, it would be better then most of the ITG Ultimate cards you would have received in it's place.

 

[Fred Bear]

From the PSA population report, there are only 57 graded Angus Campbell's total, with only one graded 6 (MC) and only 12 non-qualified cards graded above 4. I don't know how long ITG had this project in the works, but they may have gotten the best option available, especially considering the competition within the PSA registry.

 

[terrysawchuk]

Thank you for your answers.
I will post a scan tommorow.

I am a little bit disappointed from ITG as they wrote that the redemption is for a PSA 6.

I didn`t pull the card by myself i bought it from the bay to upgrade my set.
If i would have know this before i wouldn`t have paid that much.

 

[newfiecomicguy1]

Better than a PSA 5 but slightly worse than a PSA 6.