The Economics of Hockey Cards

Glenfiddich

New Member, Must Send First
Joined
Feb 13, 2022
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Location
Antigonish, NS
Just finished teaching "The Economics of Hockey Cards" -- a short week-long module in one of my classes. Here are a few observations on the industry:

1) 2020-21 Boom: Demand increased substantially from March 2020 onwards due to:

(a) lockdowns, which saw a lot of people have more free time;

(b) generous government income supports, which actually led to a RISE in average household income despite higher unemployment;

(c) lack of spending opportunities on other leisure activities (e.g. travel, sporting events, concerts, restaurants, movies, etc.) which allowed for more spending on trading cards.

--> This excess demand is currently ending as restrictions ease, income supports are removed and pent-up demand for travel and other leisure activities is allowed to be satisfied. So: Expect lower overall spending on cards, and less time devoted to the hobby by average collectors, from 2022 onwards.

2) Baby boomers and their offspring: If you want to follow the cycle of the hockey card industry, you just need to monitor data on births:

(a) The baby boomers (born 1946 to 1964) drove the demand for hockey cards from the 1950s to the 1970s, as these were exclusively targeted at the large number of kids in society.

(b) The "baby bust" of the 1970s led to fewer 10-year-olds in the 1980s to buy cards -- OPC even reduced its set size from 396 to 264 cards for this reason.

(c) When the large number of baby boomers were having their own kids in the 1980s, they became nostalgic for their own childhood, so they started collecting old toys, comic books and cards. They started buying hockey cards with their own kids in the late 1980s and early 1990s, which led to the first major card boom.

(d) As we know, the 1990s boom ended badly, largely due to over-production. Prices for many boxes in the 1990s still haven't fully recovered some 30 years later.

(e) The past decade saw a third demographic ripple, as kids of boomers were themselves having kids -- so, Boomer Grandkids. They may be getting initiated to card collecting by their parents or grandparents, but unfortunately few of them will become interested in the hobby on their own due to a lack of affordable products. Cards are today generally targeted at collectors, so the average kid can't afford the sticker price (and places that are supposed to have entry-level products, such as Wal-Mart or Target, have been overrun by collectors/speculators). We need more affordable products aimed at kids, such as Tim Horton's cards (which, unfortunately, are only available for one month per year.) If kids today don't become interested in card collecting, then they certainly won't feel any nostalgia for cards when they have jobs and disposable income in 20 years.

3) Supply-side issues: The current boom won't come crashing-down due to oversupply like in the 1990s -- manufacturers have done a good job of building scarcity into their products (e.g. limited print runs, memorabilia, autos, etc.). However, there's a risk that there may too much BREADTH of product. There may be a limit as to the number of different sets, subsets, variants, etc. that the hobby can absorb, but I'm not exactly sure where that limit lies.

For example, Alexis Lafreniere already has 690 different hockey cards. By contrast, for the 11-year period from 1979 to 1989, Wayne Gretzky only had 275.

--> This breadth of supply may dilute the value of some cards, which can impact those who view cards as an investment rather than a hobby.

4) Vintage cards: Pre-war cards are no longer subject to nostalgia as a driver of demand -- rather, they can be lumped-in with antiques, fine art or other historical collectibles. The collectors holding these sets would largely be boomers, who are currently in their 60s or 70s. Expect to see more pre-war cards to hit the market in the coming years as boomers begin to divest themselves of their collections, or when their inheritors (who may lack the same passion for card collecting) try monetizing them.

5) Information/Technology: Hockey cards are much more liquid than they were in the early 1990s thanks to the Internet. This means that casual investors are still going to be interested in buying cards of well-known players (Gretzky, Orr, McDavid, Howe, etc.) since they're going to have an easier time selling them.

Hobbies and work don't often overlap, but it's fun when they do ...
 
This is a very interesting summary and reflects my own experience. Thanks for posting. It should spark some good conversation.
Michael.
 
Thanks for sharing and very cool that you are able to overlap the two.

I see you have the card in your signature circled, does that happen to be you?
 
Interesting read, thanks for sharing! Didn't really think about the baby boomer cycle but it makes a ton of sense when looking at demographics. Strongly agree about having affordable AND accessible products to keep the hobby alive.
 
Not to quibble (well, I guess to quibble), but the factor that I expect to have the largest effect on reduced demand beyond those you list in your opening post is to do with central bank policy in light of significant inflation in the G7 (where the substantial majority of card demand lives) and the very recent expected rate rise that is going to come to stem the inflation tide (Powell has said that as early as next week we can expect Fed rate rises)...

A rate rise, coupled with inflation is likely to redirect discretionary cash flows from cards to what I expect are likely lots of floating rate obligations (e.g., credit card debt, ARMs, home loans as was mentioned by, I believe, Hama, in another thread).

Stated another way: coupled with inflation (and in effect a reduction in real wages), this rise in interest rates will likely cause much of the spending (and therefore demand) to move from buying cards and other non-durable / non-essential goods to meeting current obligatory liabilities where there's the pain of both larger month-to-month interest (and principal) payment as well as a reduction in net real wages, leaving less to buy groceries, gas, etc.

Not great for demand, and therefore for card prices, much less for the broader global economy to say nothing of the effects of the broader situation in the EU, Hong Kong, etc.
 
Not to quibble (well, I guess to quibble), but the factor that I expect to have the largest effect on reduced demand beyond those you list in your opening post is to do with central bank policy in light of significant inflation in the G7 (where the substantial majority of card demand lives) and the very recent expected rate rise that is going to come to stem the inflation tide (Powell has said that as early as next week we can expect Fed rate rises)...

A rate rise, coupled with inflation is likely to redirect discretionary cash flows from cards to what I expect are likely lots of floating rate obligations (e.g., credit card debt, ARMs, home loans as was mentioned by, I believe, Hama, in another thread).

Stated another way: coupled with inflation (and in effect a reduction in real wages), this rise in interest rates will likely cause much of the spending (and therefore demand) to move from buying cards and other non-durable / non-essential goods to meeting current obligatory liabilities where there's the pain of both larger month-to-month interest (and principal) payment as well as a reduction in net real wages, leaving less to buy groceries, gas, etc.

Not great for demand, and therefore for card prices, much less for the broader global economy to say nothing of the effects of the broader situation in the EU, Hong Kong, etc.

Excellent point. Monetary policy was excessively loose during the pandemic, with Quantitative Easing (QE) in particular fuelling growth across a wide range of financial asset prices (stocks, bonds, housing, crypto) — rates of return were quite large despite the economy experiencing its worst quarter ever in 2020Q2. Trading cards essentially became just another financial asset class for some investors who viewed these other traditional assets as being overvalued.

With QE ending, rates rising and the economy going into a more traditional slowdown — without Covid income supports — discretionary spending on items like hockey cards will definitely fall.

(Monetary policy is actually my main area of expertise, as I used to be a central banker before becoming an academic).

Great read! Are you a professor at St. F.X.? I graduated from there in 96.

If you zoom in over Pacioretty’s left shoulder, you’ll see “StFX” printed on my navy hoodie. This hoodie also has a big X on the back, since I wanted the family to have an easy time spotting me at the game.

Great post, thanks for sharing. Great card in your signature, too. Welcome to the forums!

Thanks! I enjoy your podcast a lot. I think I was first directed to this forum by your interview with Dr Price, who mentioned that he often posted here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very cool to have an Econ professor and former central banker in the forums!

I keep waiting for a major correction, particularly for non-true marquee cards and for unopened wax to return to norms (even post-inflation norms)--

We'll see; and looking forward to reading your views as the next 12-18 months unfolds. Welcome to HI!
 
Interesting points and great food for thought. I hadn't thought about older cards starting to be divested...maybe that will be good for me in picking up the older sets!
 
Not to quibble (well, I guess to quibble), but the factor that I expect to have the largest effect on reduced demand beyond those you list in your opening post is to do with central bank policy in light of significant inflation in the G7 (where the substantial majority of card demand lives) and the very recent expected rate rise that is going to come to stem the inflation tide (Powell has said that as early as next week we can expect Fed rate rises)...

A rate rise, coupled with inflation is likely to redirect discretionary cash flows from cards to what I expect are likely lots of floating rate obligations (e.g., credit card debt, ARMs, home loans as was mentioned by, I believe, Hama, in another thread).

Stated another way: coupled with inflation (and in effect a reduction in real wages), this rise in interest rates will likely cause much of the spending (and therefore demand) to move from buying cards and other non-durable / non-essential goods to meeting current obligatory liabilities where there's the pain of both larger month-to-month interest (and principal) payment as well as a reduction in net real wages, leaving less to buy groceries, gas, etc.

Not great for demand, and therefore for card prices, much less for the broader global economy to say nothing of the effects of the broader situation in the EU, Hong Kong, etc.

I agree with all of this. The bottom of a giant asset bubble is about to fall out, and it will be pretty ugly. Q1 GDP in the US could be close to 0% and inflation is running double digits. Centrals are going to tighten up significantly, which will put downward pressure on home prices, which have been used by consumers as ATM's the past decade.

I suspect softening of house prices related to rising rates is how demand dries up. Already seeing demand way down in other segments of the hobby, with key cards way off peak. 85 OPC Lemieux PSA 9 had multiple sales over 7500, now sells for 3K and softening. I think it is very likely that most of these cards that took off will revert back to something closer to pre-Covid pricing.

Not a popular opinion for sure, but this to me is the 90s all over again. I can remember dads fighting over 90 UD hky at Costco, this feels very similar.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
389,446
Messages
2,232,641
Members
4,144
Latest member
Collector Driven
Back
Top