Leaf Exclusive Nico Hischier

lucscaps, I haven't bothered reading the entirety of your response, as it was *totally* unnecessary to immediate devolve to insults. I took the time to voice my opinions, and to try and understand the collecting habits of those who do it differently than I do, and you come right back with calling me and the post garbage.

Are you trying to have the thread shut down again? Gomaz was kind enough to open the thread up again after I inquired about it, and this is your response? Your indignant anger is *exactly* why you've shown how entitled you think you are.

I've never gotten upset that I card I would like to exist doesn't. It's just not that important to me in the grand scheme of things, but obviously you get all riled up when you can't get a YG of a guy who has all of 4 total points in 12 career NHL games? Wow.

Aren't the SP GU true rookies printed to their jersey number? Hope whoever the Devils draft give him the number 4, good luck landing one then.

Look, I am *far* from a Leaf apologist, but I guess I see it now when some posters point out the negativity of others. I get the passion, the passion is great, but I never once meant to insult you or your collecting habits. You, OTOH, went right to attacking a stranger and my positions. Maybe time to rethink you're attachment to hockey cards.
 
I'm just going to put this out there but this post to me is garbage.

I collect certain cards of Devils players that feature them in a Devils uniform from sets that I like. I like to see the logo and nice picture of the player

So not even *all* cards of Devils players from sets that you like? This is where the disconnect for me comes in. You're not even striving for completeness, and you're already up in arms before the draft has even happened let alone see what the draft pick's cards even look like?

I will continue to collect the yg and sp gu rc's because they will show a picture of the player with the devils logo on them.

And what if UD chooses a pictures that for whatever reason doesn't showcase the crest well, or even at all? All this back and forth, and at the end of the day over a card that might not even float your boat once you see it? Or is it just because of the logo printed on the card and not necessarily on the actual picture being used?

Yes infact I do get upset, I was upset when John Quenneville didn't get a YG, I consider this the go to rc. You can look it up in the SPa thread. I wrote that in there. I'd love all the rc's to have a auto'd SPA rc. That's my favorite auto rc set, it's a clean and attainable release.

I agree, and I was excited myself when Kevin Hayes' FWA came out and then I saw how hideous his autograph was in my opinion, and I passed on it. I didn't get upset or riled up about it, just moved on to the next.


YG's and auto'd rc's weren't available at that time so this is not valid but they are available now so I'd like to be able to collect them as I see fit

But they also "not available" for Patrick or Hischier either, but look where we are. This is exactly what entitlement is. Exactly, full stop. The make auto RC's now, so you think you're entitled to your guy. Not so. And not garbage either.


This garbage to me. This statement is complete garbage. Why are you saying that we are spoiled? This makes no sense to me. The hobby evolved that way. It is not changing, the fact is a certain company is taking away something with the purpose of hurting the collector and another company. They are not shying away from this. It is the main objective. It's like McDonalds came in and purchased all the land that was used to grow Tim Horton's coffee beans and said sorry, but you can't have them anymore. Tims coffee drinkers would not have that freedom of choice anymore.

Totally inappropriate and incorrect analogy. Hockey cards are a finite resource. And even at its peak only less than 10 companies made them. They are often released in limited print runs, and once the year is over, the player can have no more hockey cards. Coffee is a practically unlimited resource, you can get it anywhere, and once you run out, you can easily go by more of the exact same thing. If McDonald's bought up all the sources of Tim's coffee, you'd just have to go to McDonald's and get the *same exact* coffee there. And if you say, well McDonald's coffee tastes worse than Tim's... well, they just bought Tim's supply line, so now it's the same coffee exactly. Your analogy has just completely fallen apart.

Again more garbage, specially the bolded statement. There are 99 copies of the card, everyone knows that going in. It's no secret. If you don't hit one in your case then yeah it sucks but ultimately a collector will go on the secondary market and get one if they need it. How could anyone be more upset about that then Leaf taking the possibility of the card away? This makes no sense.

I don't buy cases of cards, I'm not a group breaker, nor do I like to spend 1,000's on gambling. I buy the singles I dig, and packs of cards and the occasional box from my LCS or via retail to scratch that itch. But I certainly don;t think what you're doing by ripping cases is garbage... rather I appreciate it, as that's how the singles come to market. So... thanks! Oh and also, no one ever *needs* a card, you *want* it. Again, this is your entitlement showing. Don't shoot the messenger.

Again, I could care less about the card rising in value. I'm not after that. I'm after cards that I like. This has nothing to do with that and I have no once said anything about something rising in value. And I have asked for lesser players to have more content. I enjoy collecting Devils players as there are those that enjoy the Flyers and the Sabres. Who of them are saying awesome, I get airbrushed pictures of these players.

And that's why I said a lot of what I was saying was NOT geared towards you! Glad you're a true collector, and not a money hungry flipper. This is a good thing! Relax!

Yes we are to close, but what is stopping Leaf from doing with Patrick, Hirscher and Eichel what UD is doing with Jordan and Lebron. They effectively are. I don't see this as different.

Exactly, so why all the blind brand loyalty to UD then? They're as awful a card company as any, they've shown time and time again. So here it doesn't affect you, so you continue to purchase case after case.

If Patrick and Hirsher slip and go 3 and 4 then I would still be upset, only I would be upset for those collectors who it affects.

Yet here you say you'd be upset for other collectors who this happened to... well the Eichel exclusive happened to me, but instead of being "upset for me," you rail against my position and call it garbage? Which one is it?

I do take disrespect to this, you are implying that I shouldn't collect what I like to collect in my eyes. I have brand loyalty, product loyalty. I like certain types of cards just like I like a certain brand of coffee in the morning. I like a certain kind of protein in my shake after the gym. If UD couldn't produce auto's anymore because of something they did, or Tim's couldn't make my coffee because of something they did then it would suck, but I would move on and find something different. When an outside force comes in and blocks what I like then that's a different story.

Again, not disrespect, but your tone has spoken far louder than you may realize. Did I ever once say you shouldn't collect what you like? Why on earth would that be anyone's position? The two are completely mutually exclusive. You can absolutely collect what you like, and continue to do so. It's not like there won't be ANY Devils cards produced next year? In fact, there will be thousands. Some you will like, and purchase. And according to how you opened your post, there will be some you don't and won't. You will get a YG of both of these guys. You will get a Cup RP-not-A of both of these guys (with the opportunity overpay for an auto on it, I'm sure). You don't even know what the cards look like and you're already up in arms. You continue to demonstrate your entitlement and you don't even realize it.

You said it yourself, if Tim's coffee or your favorite protein powder was gone tomorrow, you'd move on and find something else. Same thing here... I don't see any Panini fanboys up in arms because they can't get a Dominion RPA of McDavid or Eichel or Patrick or even John Quenneville. The cards don't exist, so they just move on to the next. And can do so without lashing out at their fellow collectors.
 
I'm just going to put this out there but this post to me is garbage.

I'll answer your questions as I see them:

Once again people with argument are missing the point. When Brodeur had a rookie there weren't rookie autos of any players. Rookie autos are the norm now thus having that option of a licensed rookie auto taken away from a collector is the main issue here. Understand now?

But what you're missing is that this is *EXACTLY* what entitlement is!
 
I question the first part of your reply in that people will pay exorbitant amounts for the opportunity to have UD items signed by Eichel, as the market simply doesn't back that up. It does make complete sense to me that someone heavily invested in Eichel, and more specifically Leaf Eichel cards would defend the value of their products.

I saw two completed listings for Eichel signed YGs, one for $75, and one for $80 USD - both far below the price charged for the autograph alone - the young guns card itself being worth at least $40.

For the same $105, you could purchase at least three, probably 4 low-numbered Leaf Eichel autographs from various products. If the value of a Leaf branded Eichel autograph on the open market is $30 or so, why turn around and nearly quadruple the cost for a privately signed item? If this private signing option was truly about the customer/collector and giving them an opportunity, why price people out in such a way?

I agree with you 100%, wholeheartedly and absolutely. Leaf overcharged for these and squeezed the collector on this private signing, and will probably do the same for their new guys. I hated sending them $210 for two autos, but they let me choose my pen, and choose my cards to have signed, so I'm at least grateful for that. And from what I've seen on eBay, there are at least a few people who also purchased from the signing, and probably lost money doing so. It goes both ways, and I do hold it against Leaf for squeezing us. Don't say you're doing me (and collectors) a favor and then stick your hand in my wallet. The signing had both advantages and disadvantages, and I prefer to keep my eyes on the sunny side of the road. But you are certainly not wrong here.

Eichel was a very highly touted prospect, and generated a huge amount of buzz - while I disagree, consensus in this thread seems to be that both of this year's top two picks will be marginal NHL players and won't have nearly the impact that Eichel has had in Buffalo.

My question is this - Why bother even signing these guys to exclusives? If Eichel hasn't helped your brand, what makes you think that these lesser talents will increase Leaf's popularity? This is a lose-lose situation, as the collector does not benefit from unlicensed, often uninspired cards being released followed up with private signings that vastly exaggerate the value of the product, and the brand doesn't make any gains, either.

Don't disagree with you here either... I do often wonder if Leaf's bottom line was improved signing Jack. I mean, they obviously charged as much as they did for the signing to help recoup their initial layout on the contract with him, but have they really improved their visibility in the marketplace because of it. I honestly don't know, and I posit none of us here know either because, we are the most passionate collectors of all, and our presence here shows that. It's the casual collectors, the ones who want that McDavid YG but only collect baseball, or that grandma who knows their grandkid loves cards and gets a tin via retail that you really need to make inroads with. Has Leaf done that? I'm skeptical.

Would you mind posting your Leaf Eichel collection in S&T? I for one would love to see it, and I'm sure that it would give the folks at Leaf a thrill as well.

Sure! I have a thread already here:

http://www.hobbyinsider.net/forum/showthread.php?t=412472

I haven't updated it in a while, so it fell off the first page a while ago. I need to update it with some new red parallels I have, and I have a *licensed* Leaf Team USA Eichel (no airbrushing that I can see - Team USA crest clearly shown on his jersey) auto coming in the mail today actually, so I'll update it in the next couple of days, but it's still pretty extensive as of now, with a mix of both Leaf and UD cards.
 
I guess charnick is the hobby police now? Dude, give your head a shake. Some people are upset that they won't be able to collect autographs of certain players on licensed cards. It's a valid reason to be against this whole exclusive issue whether you agree with it or not


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
But what you're missing is that this is *EXACTLY* what entitlement is!

Entitlement in your words is for the last 15 years card companies ramming autos and gu cards down everyone's throats. This is your definition of entitlement?

Card companies introduced the auto and gu craze of this hobby not the collectors. These same companies also water downed this same idea to the point of gu being stuffed in $1 bin boxes and Lemieux, Orr and Howe autos being devalued.

This is collector entitlement? Collectors are some what to blame by continuing to support these companies but to say the collectors are entitled is complete nonsense and doesn't even make sense.
 
I guess charnick is the hobby police now? Dude, give your head a shake. Some people are upset that they won't be able to collect autographs of certain players on licensed cards. It's a valid reason to be against this whole exclusive issue whether you agree with it or not

Jeebus, wow, everyone so defensive! Again, let me be plain-as-day clear about this: COLLECT WHAT YOU LIKE, I DON'T CARE.

I'm just trying to understand the collecting habits of those who do it differently. Im not angry or indignant about it, so why are you? I *NEVER NEVER NEVER* said your position wasn't valid. It is. But it's not my position, and all of sudden I'm the hobby police? Like now I'm forcing you to collect a certain way?

I was also never rude, never used salty language, and I'm getting attacked? Believe me, dude, if I were the hobby police, I would have publicly called you out for the comedy of errors you committed during our first transaction together.
 
Jeebus, wow, everyone so defensive! Again, let me be plain-as-day clear about this: COLLECT WHAT YOU LIKE, I DON'T CARE.

I'm just trying to understand the collecting habits of those who do it differently. Im not angry or indignant about it, so why are you? I *NEVER NEVER NEVER* said your position wasn't valid. It is. But it's not my position, and all of sudden I'm the hobby police? Like now I'm forcing you to collect a certain way?

I was also never rude, never used salty language, and I'm getting attacked? Believe me, dude, if I were the hobby police, I would have publicly called you out for the comedy of errors you committed during our first transaction together.



Lol. You love to attack people and then get extremely defensive when they get upset. You start posts with "please don't take offense but..." and then proceed to offend people. You're being a douche and others are calling you out for it.

I hate exclusives and I certainly don't believe anyone is signing these for the good of the hobby. It's a business decision and Leaf or UD have the right to do whatever they want. Just don't be shocked when many customers get upset when it happens.

Everyone could collect what they want if the marketplace was open and competition was equal. That's not the case right now and the consumer is the one who is losing out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Entitlement in your words is for the last 15 years card companies ramming autos and gu cards down everyone's throats. This is your definition of entitlement?

Card companies introduced the auto and gu craze of this hobby not the collectors. These same companies also water downed this same idea to the point of gu being stuffed in $1 bin boxes and Lemieux, Orr and Howe autos being devalued.

This is collector entitlement? Collectors are some what to blame by continuing to support these companies but to say the collectors are entitled is complete nonsense and doesn't even make sense.

You're absolutely right about the watering down of products and the decrease of values, especially of the legends. No doubt. And while I admit the argument of not having a Brodeur auto RC is certainly a little specious, it was made to illustrate the point that to me there's no need getting all up in arms over cards that won't ever exist.

I use the word entitlement because collector's now *expect* all these auto RPA's every year, even when they were never promised them in the first place. You got something for the past 10-15 years, and it sucks when someone takes them away from you, I get that. I even understand that part of it. But the anger, being indigant about it, I don't get. OK, Eichel doesn't have them, I moved on, and quickly at that.

You might disagree with my assessment, you might disagree with how I collect, but I ain't angry about it, and I sure as heck wouldn't say your position doesn't make sense.
 
Jeebus, wow, everyone so defensive! Again, let me be plain-as-day clear about this: COLLECT WHAT YOU LIKE, I DON'T CARE.

I'm just trying to understand the collecting habits of those who do it differently. Im not angry or indignant about it, so why are you? I *NEVER NEVER NEVER* said your position wasn't valid. It is. But it's not my position, and all of sudden I'm the hobby police? Like now I'm forcing you to collect a certain way?

I was also never rude, never used salty language, and I'm getting attacked? Believe me, dude, if I were the hobby police, I would have publicly called you out for the comedy of errors you committed during our first transaction together.

I think the different collecting habits have been pretty clearly expressed throughout the pages and pages of this thread. Calling those habits "entitled" or otherwise disagreeing with everything collectors are upset about is not "trying to understand". At all.
 
I think the different collecting habits have been pretty clearly expressed throughout the pages and pages of this thread. Calling those habits "entitled" or otherwise disagreeing with everything collectors are upset about is not "trying to understand". At all.

OK, you know what, I'm man enough to admit I can see how this would be perceived as an attack. As I said, not trying to insult anyone, and although I still feel the way I do, my apologies. That being said, I also think it's clear I was also attacked, and in a much ruder, more forceful way than my tone. My views were were called "garbage," was told my position didn't make sense, called the hobby police, and was railed at by multiple members. I never once got angry or indignant about my opinion. It's hockey cards, and we're adults (I assume), and I don't think I deserved to be spoken to like that. Yet it's me that needs to do the self reflection? Goes both ways, fellas.
 
OK, you know what, I'm man enough to admit I can see how this would be perceived as an attack. As I said, not trying to insult anyone, and although I still feel the way I do, my apologies. That being said, I also think it's clear I was also attacked, and in a much ruder, more forceful way than my tone. My views were were called "garbage," was told my position didn't make sense, called the hobby police, and was railed at by multiple members. I never once got angry or indignant about my opinion. It's hockey cards, and we're adults (I assume), and I don't think I deserved to be spoken to like that. Yet it's me that needs to do the self reflection? Goes both ways, fellas.

You went off on every post that didn't fit with your opinion calling people entitled and using comments like "money hungry flippers", questioning lucscaps collecting habits and you got the backlash you deserved.
 
I'm rather curious if Upper Deck isn't secretly delighted by this little exclusive battle. They've been doing a lot of tweaking around number of cards per pack, packs per box, etc... adjusting numbers of hits per box vs pricing... and now the Bounty program which I'm assuming not-so-coincidentally started at the same time they removed the third auto hit from SPA. It feels like they're taking a real hard look at what they can do on every product to maximize profitability - and I wouldn't be surprised if they're thrilled that they can a) save the expense by shifting to a lower percentage of auto hits, b) blame Leaf, and c) position themselves as the saviours of the hobby by bringing back healthy set collecting habits.

I don't really have any stake in the battle, but I totally feel for all the collectors upset by what's transpiring - from the sidelines though I'm really fascinated to see how this plays out next year. We've definitely heard from those most vocal about what's gone down, but both companies know pretty much everything they do is going to make at least someone upset, the real interesting question is the quieter majority, how much will this influence their purchases next year.
 
Lol. You love to attack people and then get extremely defensive when they get upset. You start posts with "please don't take offense but..." and then proceed to offend people. You're being a douche and others are calling you out for it.

I hate exclusives and I certainly don't believe anyone is signing these for the good of the hobby. It's a business decision and Leaf or UD have the right to do whatever they want. Just don't be shocked when many customers get upset when it happens.

Everyone could collect what they want if the marketplace was open and competition was equal. That's not the case right now and the consumer is the one who is losing out.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wow, just wow. Get off your high horse, muchacho. This is the type of discourse you prefer? Literally slinging insults towards strangers? And after I specifically overpaid on a couple of Eichel cards to you just to give you another shot after you didn't even put *any* postage on a replacement card you sent after your initial screwup? Only by the grace of god did the post office even deliver it to me at all... boy I wish I still had a picture of that one. Yet not once did I ever call you names privately or publicly about it. You should be ashamed of yourself, pal.
 
I figured I'd pipe in with a few facts, just in case anyone even cares about the facts:

1> I approached Jason Masherah (President of UD), Mike Phillips (VP Hobby Sales) and Chris Carlin (you know Chris) in Hawaii last year. I told them I was done signing exclusives if they would stop. Despite their continued contention that I am out of line for doing exclusives and they are not, I steadfastly stayed the course...

IF YOU DON'T DO ANY MORE EXCLUSIVES, WE WONT EITHER AND COLLECTORS WILL WIN.

2> Upper Deck immediately proceeded to sign Auston Matthews. We did not sign anyone, despite our gut instinct to sign Laine and Marner, we did not sign anyone. We tried to stay the course... NO EXCLUSIVES!

3> Then, Upper Deck signs PATRICK ROY exclusive. This is the same Patrick Roy that has been a key figure in "In the Game" products since day one. Still, Leaf has not signed ANY EXCLUSIVES....

4> Upper Deck went after our CHL license. We had an opportunity to match, but we do not have long term confidence in that category, so we let it go....

THIS IS UD GOING AFTER THREE EXCLUSIVE DEALS, WHILE WE WAITED A FULL YEAR AND DIDNT SIGN A SINGLE EXCLUSIVE DEAL (Nolan Patrick was already locked up right around the time of Eichel, just in case you are thinking we did sign Patrick)...

We did "the right thing" and sat on the sideline and tried to have a non exclusive atmosphere... During the last 24 months, I have reached out to Upper Deck at least 10 times... I have offered a sit down to stop the madness.

Upper Deck does not care and will not care until the consumer makes them care.

They have much bigger issues at the moment. $97 million in unpaid taxes (which an article released based on court documents yesterday actually estimate could really be $160 million or more)....

I still believe UD will eventually realize that this is not helping the consumer and will sit down....

But, make no mistake, NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNLESS IT IS FORCED TO CHANGE.

I am confident and certain that the exclusives HAVE TO STOP. I am ready and willing to sit down right now. Heck, I would offer to have the meeting in front of a ballroom full of collectors at the Fall Expo (lol)....

I don't expect everyone to like this..... BUT, competition will pay off long term for all collectors whether you buy UD, Leaf or Both.... regardless, Leaf pushing UD to do and be better is a positive thing! (and for that matter, UD pushing us makes us better also!!!)...

Hopefully, this makes some sense.... I never hide on stuff like this.

Brian Gray
CEO, Leaf

P.S.- I am happy to answer any questions you may have in this thread as well, since I'm here.... (and we encourage our competition to join the forum and answer your questions candidly and honestly as well....)

WOW this is amazing honesty and I think it will help Leaf in the future. I like my cards with a NHL logo on it but in my opinion, UD is not helping and if the license can switch, I would be all over Leaf cards for sure! Thanks!
 
Wow, just wow. Get off your high horse, muchacho. This is the type of discourse you prefer? Literally slinging insults towards strangers? And after I specifically overpaid on a couple of Eichel cards to you just to give you another shot after you didn't even put *any* postage on a replacement card you sent after your initial screwup? Only by the grace of god did the post office even deliver it to me at all... boy I wish I still had a picture of that one. Yet not once did I ever call you names privately or publicly about it. You should be ashamed of yourself, pal.

Give it a rest. You obviously pissed people off and they called you out. Instead of trying to fling the blame back on them/me, just take your medicine and walk away. You can keep trying to dig yourself out of the hole you've created by bashing me or anyone else who doesn't like your posts but it just makes you look even worse. This will be the last time I reply to you.
 
jeez, i regret getting the thread reopened, today will have it shut down for sure. to those who felt offended, you're not collecting wrong, and i appreciate your passion, but please also realize that your language toward me was rude, vitriolic, and unnecessary.

edit to frank: what hole? i still feel the way i do and don't feel like was taking any medicine. i aint the only one who feels this way, and i do not apologize for my opinion. if anything. thanks for showing your true colors calling someone a douche, then disguising it under your righteous indignation. you might have a lot of friends and colleagues on this board, and i might be outnumbered in this particular conversation, but you're nothing but a childish fool in my eyes, go cry in your milk about your exclusives.
 
I'm rather curious if Upper Deck isn't secretly delighted by this little exclusive battle. They've been doing a lot of tweaking around number of cards per pack, packs per box, etc... adjusting numbers of hits per box vs pricing... and now the Bounty program which I'm assuming not-so-coincidentally started at the same time they removed the third auto hit from SPA. It feels like they're taking a real hard look at what they can do on every product to maximize profitability - and I wouldn't be surprised if they're thrilled that they can a) save the expense by shifting to a lower percentage of auto hits, b) blame Leaf, and c) position themselves as the saviours of the hobby by bringing back healthy set collecting habits.

I don't really have any stake in the battle, but I totally feel for all the collectors upset by what's transpiring - from the sidelines though I'm really fascinated to see how this plays out next year. We've definitely heard from those most vocal about what's gone down, but both companies know pretty much everything they do is going to make at least someone upset, the real interesting question is the quieter majority, how much will this influence their purchases next year.

We are starting to see UD moving away from auto content as the driving force behind many of their products. I for one couldn't be happier. I miss the days of set collecting being what drives the hobby. Group breaks have taken over and everything now is about "How many hits do I get per box?". Even though most of those autos and jerseys will eventually end up in $1 bins, people still want more in packs! I'd much prefer to see cool, innovative inserts and parallels instead. It would also help bring wax prices down!

If Leaf signing these exclusives helps push UD to move in this direction then I'm all for it! :)
 
We are starting to see UD moving away from auto content as the driving force behind many of their products. I for one couldn't be happier. I miss the days of set collecting being what drives the hobby. Group breaks have taken over and everything now is about "How many hits do I get per box?". Even though most of those autos and jerseys will eventually end up in $1 bins, people still want more in packs! I'd much prefer to see cool, innovative inserts and parallels instead. It would also help bring wax prices down!

If Leaf signing these exclusives helps push UD to move in this direction then I'm all for it! :)

I agree with this. I would love to see more products like Panini did with Prizm or something similar to that. I love all of the old "rainbow" type sets that Pacific did in the 2000's.
 
I've always felt autographs and game used pieces should be a more rare hit. I think you see baseball doing this. Topps Heritage is a HUGE product and you get one auto or memorabilia per box. They drive sales with the sets, the SP's and the variations. Like many have said the autos, unless you hit a star, end up being worthless in the long run. While a nicely graded base rookie can sell for good money. Example, 1986 Donruss rated rookie Jose Canseco. Ungraded, you can pick it up for a few bucks. PSA 10, $100 all day long, can't find it for less. That's the hunt I enjoy.

Derek K.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
390,135
Messages
2,238,796
Members
4,169
Latest member
Misso
Back
Top