Any Way To Politely Ask Upper Deck To Include A Player?

[CoburnCollector]

As the title says, is there any way to politely as Upper Deck to include a player in a set? After seeing the Engrained Icons set, I'm practically begging for another Coburn autograph or stick SOMEWHERE, yet the set is inundated with guys that played half the games.

 

[TBstanleycup04]

As the title says, is there any way to politely as Upper Deck to include a player in a set? After seeing the Engrained Icons set, I'm practically begging for another Coburn autograph or stick SOMEWHERE, yet the set is inundated with guys that played half the games.

You can try but nobody opening in a box or pack of some high-end product wants to get Brayden Coburn in it trust me..
I'd be pissed.

 

[CoburnCollector]

Oh, I'm not asking for a Cup autograph, but if we're getting Brent Ashton, Cory Cross, Adrian Aucoin, Craig Ludwig, etc, autographs in the Engrained Icons set, maybe we could try different players. I feel like they're the same batch of names that were base autographs in the Signature Legends set.

 

[mclaw131]

I would argue that anyone who's retired within the current decade shouldn't be considered "icon" or "legend" status in these products. That's why you didn't see the likes of, for Boston, Bergeron, Krejci and Chara, in these sets; three players who by most considerations are "Legends" for the Bruins, but just haven't been out of the game long enough. That's why everyone has been questioning Dustin Brown's inclusion in the set(s); not that he may not be deserving of Icon/Legend status, but he's just not been out of the game long enough for the label. I'm sure Coburn may find himself in one of those sets in the future, given the depth of Lightning .

There are definitely some questionable autos in Engrained Icons. Don Marcotte and Steve Heinze are not two names that generally pop up high on the Bruins auto lists...