Thanks. These were good reads.
So the Washington Post article has Brent from PWCC admit to knowing selling fake patches. Unfortunately, still - this is inconclusive to me about PWCC being a company intentionally engaging in unethical activities.
There must be a time when sellers, including PWCC, have cards change hands so much that there may be some patch altering going on. No system will be 100% foolproof. There is reasonable probability that PWCC found out late, took action and tried to make things right with not engaging with said consignor and taking money from PWCC to right the wrongs from unsuspecting customers. On the other hand, it may be the case that people assume consignor and auction house be in it together. This is a serious claim. I like to believe innocent until proven guilty. It is so easy to throw accusations.
The card trimming one I have seen before. As PSA has so many cards to grade and it is their job to ensure consistent standards across its grading team, the grading team are all mortals.
What I would be curious to know is if larger, more iconic cards in the hobby need a higher-level approval for the grade to be released? It makes sense to me as more eyes are on the card and thus more reputation risk if wrong. However, I don't know. Jeremy - any insight you can add here from your network?
In the end, you need to specialize what you look at and do your own diligence. Yes, buyer beware.