anuske9
Registered Trader
So, I've noticed more and more sellers are requiring that any orders over 50$ be shipped with expresspost/registered mail. However, shipping this way can run somebody anywhere from 12-14 dollars. (US/CA shipping on ebay is the subject) And I was thinking about how many cards I've lost in the mail over the course of 100+ deals I've done and that answer is one. Considering that normal shipping is 3-5$ (I ship for 2, which is unreasonably high to some people on ebay apparently). Rounding down to 100 deals, and rounding up to a 10$ difference in shipping and multiplying the two, you come to approx. 1000$ in added expenses for a buyer. Which means to make this practice reasonable, assuming the cards are worth $50+, I would have to lose about 20% of the cards sent to me. I've even seen sellers requiring expresspost for cards over 25$, which is even more insane, only becoming reasonable if a buyer loses around 40% of their cards in the mail. Now, the reason that sellers require this to protect themselves from having to give refunds from "missing" cards. However, I would like to propose some sort of agreement that says as long as the seller can prove they shipped the item (tracking to the border), that the buyer has to forgo his rights to make a claim on the basis of a missing card. That way I'm only out 60$ if a card goes missing, rather than 1000$ (or even 500 minimum for tracking). Thanks for the read, feedback appreciated.
-Adam
-Adam
Last edited: