I guess my question about UD in general is how long will all these "irregularities" leading to controversy last? I know that sounds stupid, but with no evidence of the Gretzky Rookie Review Patch existing, and all the countless let alone unwanted rookie buybacks and previously signed "buybacks", what was the point of this product? Compared to the other hockey products made by UD this year what was really different about SPA? I know in years' past, at least for me, the most sought after thing from SPA was the rookie card. THis time around, there is no such thing. HOw many different autos do you need of Gretzky, Brodeur, Leclaire, etc to be satisfied? One of the things they could have done to make this product a little interesting would have been to take a lot of the non-autoed rookies from past UD products (like Gaborik's SPA and Comrie's SPA, or how about Lehtonen's Premier) and inserted them into this year's SPA with an auto of the player. I probably would have bought more than one box. Fleer did this with 1986 Basketball and inserted the coveted Michael Jordan Rookie Card with MJ's sig on it, but I thought MJ had an exclusive contract with UD. Anyway back on track... It could have been better, and a bit more interesting. It's basically Hockey's version of SP Signature Series without the SP's... I could go on and on, so I should just get back to the voting. The design is nice, but that's it. They put a few extra autos in the boxes and added a few more auto patches to each case, and that was justification enough to jack up the price by nearly $20 compared to years past? UD Signature Series should be interesting as well, it'll just be SPA only with a different name. DOes anyone remember the movie Tommy Boy, and the exact same movie came out again with the same premise a few years later: Black Sheep... Ok, thanks for the rant. Ignore as necessary...