TMLFan3
New Member, Must Send First!
Anyone feeling malaise currently for hockey cards like me? I am. UD is really taking the wind out of my sails. We need competition. Blah.
I always wonder if people forget all of the complaining that was happening when there were multiple manufacturers... There are too many products, so many products are crap, it's impossible to collect everything I want... and of course, the manufacturers were having a hard time trying to be viable with a limited number of products. It's fine to remember the good parts, but don't forget the bad parts.
Really, the only option now, and even then, is to vote with your wallet. If you don't like what they're putting out, spend your money on something you do... I can't see the landscape changing back to a competitive model.
Just my 5 cents.
Cory
A few things I'd maybe like to see from UD:
1) A one game used card per pack item (kinda like 01-02 pacific private stock):
- would open a few for $15 a pack, include a few base cards, 1 insert, and 1 parallel... make it a retail product
2) High end Rookie product, maybe something like where all of the actual set chase rookie cards are short printed to the player jsy #
- base set could picture every player in their rookie year (ie: use a photo of Mackinnon from 13/14, Crosby from 05/06 etc).
- Have memorabilia cards include more than just jerseys, include sticks, pucks, gloves, etc.
- Have a focus on 90% of the mem cards being rookies
3) Autograph only product.
- Every single card in the product has an autograph.
- Have players use every color sharpie out there to sign (including crazy colors like orange, pink, neon green, etc... would love to see more signatures using a red/green sharpie.
- Each pack has 5 cards, all are autos. Call the set Upper Deck "inked up".
- Include cut autos
- maybe have photos of players signing stuff for fans
- Have a puck surface, jsy surface, clear game used ice surface... have the players sign over the top of that
- Have a redemption 1/1 chase card for certain players where players will sign the card to a person
- include those dumb "banner" cards from spgu in these and have players sign the banner
Perhaps I have a different perspective, but I too struggle with the current landscape.
As much as Upper Deck is an easy target (for hockey), when I look back at some of the designs and set configurations, it does look like they continually seek out new ideas or concepts. Even as a very small custom card maker, it’s way tougher than you think to come up with new ideas; endlessly. It also feels like they’ve put significant effort into material creativity as well as printing options/printing quality.
The card size is a limitation, plus I’m confident both the NHL and NHLPA are limiting factors too. When I take a step back to get a broader perspective, they do create some nice stuff.
I would put our quality up with anyone.... designs, athletes, innovation. Volumes don't always need to be nosebleed
ITG is missed, period. In my brain they’ve always been somewhere between fringe and niche. It doesn’t mean they didn’t do great stuff, because they did. Clearly their absence continues to tug at our heartstrings because most collectors have some degree of ITG in their collections (me included). Even with that said, I believe that even if they got a license back, they would remain fringe/niche.
Leaf. If all companies were to get licenses, it is my opinion that Leaf wouldn’t be able to compete (quality or volume).
And at least the three companies above have a history in hockey, and experience producing hockey products. Any other business’s entry into the market would be a step backwards at least in the short term, possibly long term.
So, in summary I’m good with Upper Deck’s commitment to hockey. A competitor could improve that, but I’m not convinced it would be a significant improvement (on products).
That leaves price. IMHO price is less influenced by Upper Deck than perhaps we think. They create a product, and based on the costs associated with the production/delivery of the product, they apply a margin that they feel they should get. Once the product goes to market, Upper Deck gains no additional monies if the product takes off.
Collectors impact pricing way more than they realize, but more on a macro scale. The foundational price is set by Upper Deck’s price point per case. Any other increase in price is driven by collectors and middlemen. Collectors will pay what they can afford (generally) for a card they really want.
Middlemen – as time passes the hobby has really turned into more of an investment/profit center for the middleman. And when you think back maybe 15 years or more, the only real middlemen where the stores (including eBay). But now there are so many platforms where middlemen can sell their cards/sets/boxes. Although I have no data to pull from, it really appears that the hobby has experienced a huge uptick in the number of people trying to profit from the hobby.
So ya OP, I feel you. I’ve typed way more than I thought I would LOL, my apologies. For me, I focus on my collections, and I try to avoid the profit game. Specifically, when I sell my cards at shows/etc I keep that money in my hobby. I’m not trying to build a retirement package on the hobby.
I disagree and take offense!I don't really take offense, but I disagree. Leaf is in prime position to not only compete but thrive if given the opportunity to engage with the league.
With Pearl, ITGU Hockey, Ultimate Hockey and Lumber Hockey among other products, we have shown we can make valued and compelling products.
Competition itself makes everyone strive to improve, that includes Leaf.
I can say that upcoming Ultimate and ITU Hockey have sold through, so someone thinks we can make products compelling enough.
We may not be everyones cup of Tim Hortons, but we do give collectors a choice if they want vintage and legendary players, signatures and memorabilia
Either way, collect what you like and never let me or anyone tell you what you should collect and enjoy nor how to collect. if there were 4 companies making hockey cards, I am sure they would all offer something unique (especially leaf)
I have an honest questions for you, Gregg, if you have a moment.
IF Leaf were to acquire a license, do you think the company would continue to make products as it has? Meaning, are all of your products going to continue be "high end" (1 pack/box, 5-6 cards per, all GU and/or auto)?
I can understand why Leaf works the way it does now. Not a whole lot of sense making base cards of current players (or in general) without the ability to use trademarked logos.
Would that mindset continue, or would Leaf then have the "little guys" in mind and start producing low-end sets, such as MVP and OPC from Upper Deck? Or a set which focuses on the rookies and makes staple cards for them, in the same vein as Young Guns in UDS1/2/Extended?
I only ask because I think THAT is what BB was trying to get at. Not that you wouldn't be able to produce products of a similar style that you already are, but not at the quantity which coming with a license could/would require.
Cool to see you are on here Gregg!
Have any ideas what you guys will be doing with the "between the pipes" trademark?
Any chance we'll see more hockey specific releases this season?
Have a great day!