question about autos on cards

BenDMitchell

New Member, Must Send First,
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
961
Reaction score
0
Location
West Chester, PA
I am still beginning in the hobby so please bear with me. Are there two different ways for players to sign cards? Is there something along the lines of signing a sticker or signing the card directly? Which one is better? How do you tell if you have one or the other?
 
I am still beginning in the hobby so please bear with me. Are there two different ways for players to sign cards? Is there something along the lines of signing a sticker or signing the card directly? Which one is better? How do you tell if you have one or the other?

I don't know a lot about these either, but signing the card itself instead of sticker is much better.
 
I'm probably the only one that thinks this way, but I dont care if the auto is on the card or on a sticker. Afterall, its the autograph I am looking for to add to the collection.

I agree with you. However, no one can argue that a hard-signed autograph looks much nicer on a card than a sticker. I actually like the way ITG "incorporates" the sticker into their cards. It's a much cleaner design than a sticker slapped on top of a card
 
Sticker autos are fairly easy to tell apart, just fyi.

Also, I really don't mind sticker autos as long as they compliment the design and look like they belong. There are a lot of really sharp hard-signed autos, though.
 
I don't mind stickers either. However, how the card is designed for the sticker counts a bit.

For example.

Heroes and Prospects earlier designs have the stick slappped at the bottom of the card whereas the last three releases have designed the card to incorporate the sticker and it looks much better and less obvious.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
390,203
Messages
2,239,314
Members
4,172
Latest member
Singin
Back
Top