It's a funny topic.
I mean, I'm not sure how anyone can call them the "same" card. What one person likes vs the next, it's all subjective.... but I'll use Iginla (was the example above) but a different card... simply because I found a buyback, and an in person signed version:
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/JAROME-IGINL...664313?hash=item27f024bdf9:g:4LwAAOSwosFUXAE2
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/15-16-Upper-...856503?hash=item3d07064537:g:u2EAAOSwo6lWLB4X
Those are not the same thing. I mean, the auto quality on the buyback is a lot better anyway.... but you could click the BIN and get one for less than a 10th of the price of the other (and it's a card /3, not even a 1/1).
Do I think either of these cards will sell at those prices? No. The IP would probably get no bids at 99 cents. The Buyback might get half of that (but the difference in asking prices is my point).
Ranford didn't have anything in this product, but I would have gone after them if he had. The prices that some of these cards have gone for has exceeded my expectations, but I think that simply reflects the value that collectors put on that UD COA (vs anyone selling IP autos) and also the popularity of nostalgia.... which I think has a lot to do with it.
I mean, I don't under stand the attraction towards a buy-back YG from 2 years ago, of a mid-level player, numbered to 25...... but I do see the attraction to a 1/1 autograph of one of your favs from the 90s, from a UD set you remember busting packs from.
As for the "true 1/1" tag, I would liken these more to 1/1 parallels, so whatever you call those (true? not true?) I'd label these the same. They've got more in common with a "Gold" version /1 than they do a Shield, if that's what the question is.