BillInDallas
Verified Trader,
Hopefully someone doesn't get the idea of trimming it to sharpen things up a bit.
Well the reason it sold for that price has to do with the low grade - only a 7. So not really a steal imo. I wouldn't have paid that dollar for only a 7.Maybe There's Something Wrong With It?!
How do ya know it's been graded twice?
That makes it even more interesting. Probably worth considerably less than what he paid. Probably a steal at around $2k. The OP saying that himself and another buyer would pay 12k for it is foolish. Maybe the OP is actually the buyer and feels like he has to justify spending that kind of cash on a damaged card and sees some of the backlash and opinions on here.From what I understand, the 6.5 corner on that card is a VERY generous grade by Beckett.
That makes it even more interesting. Probably worth considerably less than what he paid. Probably a steal at around $2k. The OP saying that himself and another buyer would pay 12k for it is foolish. Maybe the OP is actually the buyer and feels like he has to justify spending that kind of cash on a damaged card and sees some of the backlash and opinions on here.
First: If the corner is as bad as some members say it is - shame on the seller for not mentioning it on a card of this value - graded or not.
Second: Based on the overwhelming majority of this sellers listings - the seller is hiding the fact based on the very poor scan provided. The rest of their auctions show VERY sharp scans.
Third: As far as condition not being as important in such a limited card - I would say that with any card of this value , condition is MORE important. While this card at a 8.5 or 9.0 would be good for anyone's private collection - most collectors willing to spend this amount of money are not willing to accept a corner as damaged as has been said. They will accept a single color or bland two color, or even some corner damage or face blemish, but not a severely dinged corner.
Just my opinion.
Some excellent points. It does appear the seller was trying to hide the fact that the card had a low sub-grade on the corners (or just the damaged corner). That kind of damage should be openly stated. Condition is paramount to most collectors. Having a vintage card with a dinged corner, which is a high-end vintage rookie, say, is a whole different ball game compared to a modern card such as that Sid, no matter how high-end or sought after it might be. A poor scan given the situation is definitely suspect. The 5K could've been better spent, imo.First: If the corner is as bad as some members say it is - shame on the seller for not mentioning it on a card of this value - graded or not.
Second: Based on the overwhelming majority of this sellers listings - the seller is hiding the fact based on the very poor scan provided. The rest of their auctions show VERY sharp scans.
Third: As far as condition not being as important in such a limited card - I would say that with any card of this value , condition is MORE important. While this card at a 8.5 or 9.0 would be good for anyone's private collection - most collectors willing to spend this amount of money are not willing to accept a corner as damaged as has been said. They will accept a single color or bland two color, or even some corner damage or face blemish, but not a severely dinged corner.
Just my opinion.
Guaranteed that card will end up re-slabbed and come back a 9.
they no longer do that with serial numbered cards , as all they will do is get the previous grade from the Data base and re slab the card with the same exact grade without even going through the grading process but they will still charge you the full amount as it was graded all over again