Another UD cut signature screwup?

[RGM81]

Good idea, Dr. Price....

 

[kennycolwell]

Has UD provided a response to this issue yet?

 

[JohnnyDrama]

A lack of accountability has soured me on most game-used cards (I'm aware this is a cut but it's of the same ilk). These guys can't get the right swatch in a jersey, how do we know they didn't totally screw up where they even got it from?

We need someone, anyone, to hold UD accountable for their actions and make them CARE again.

 

[spooner9ball]

I just started a new thread with the link to the NHLPA Contact us email. Go have your say!!

 

[telemakhos3]

Three words:

Off The Record...

I think it would make a great show (or part thereof).

And now I've got an UD 6 on 6 Rivals Jerseys that do not have any official COA on them... and I don't trust UD to have used official jerseys on it. DAMMIT!

On a side note, has anyone considered the idea that these game-used 'jersey' cards are nothing more than a pair of game-worn socks? I'd hope not, but I wouldn't put anything past UD.:|

 

[jetsman]

from the sounds of it, the 6 on 6 would have no space for the authentication and would have a COA accompanying it. most cards of 8 or more swatches have that.

As for OTR, TSN doesn't give a flying **** about the card industry. They didn't cover when the exclusive was launched, why would they now?

As for jersys/socks, very different material dude

 

[jetsman]

Has UD provided a response to this issue yet?

UD doesn't respond herereally. Has anyone posted something in their Facebook fan page?

 

[kennycolwell]

UD doesn't respond herereally. Has anyone posted something in their Facebook fan page?

Karvin "The Architect" has responded in past topics like these. I assumed a call or an email would have been sent as well.