GoCanGo
Verified Trader
I haven't read through the entire 7 pages (I've read the first 3 1/2 pages), so excuse me if this has been covered...
This is far from an isolated or new incident. I remember a member about 2 years ago pulling a Crosby Black 1/1 YG plate out of 05-06 UDII. That member was challenged for his honesty by another member on the old Beckett boards who already possessed the Crosby 1/1 Black YG plate. It turns out they were both being honest and they both possessed it.
Now remember, that set was released over 3 years ago. I have seen the same thing repeated in 06-07 where 2 members possessed the same plate. It's probably been like that every year since they inserted the plate.
Although, regardless of all this, I think you should be accepting compensation from Upper Deck for what they did, because it's most likely that if ever this case was to go to Court, you would either lose or make an arrangement out of court that would force you to shut up about it and give them the dupes in return of compensation. But your claim is legit as it's not an isolated mistake but rather it was done purposely, and also because the plate itself and the Upper Deck checklists state the plate should be a 1/1 (regardless if every plate was unique and a 1/1 by themselves, the checklist claims there should only be one of each plate).
Anyway it will be interesting to see how this develops.
This is far from an isolated or new incident. I remember a member about 2 years ago pulling a Crosby Black 1/1 YG plate out of 05-06 UDII. That member was challenged for his honesty by another member on the old Beckett boards who already possessed the Crosby 1/1 Black YG plate. It turns out they were both being honest and they both possessed it.
Now remember, that set was released over 3 years ago. I have seen the same thing repeated in 06-07 where 2 members possessed the same plate. It's probably been like that every year since they inserted the plate.
Although, regardless of all this, I think you should be accepting compensation from Upper Deck for what they did, because it's most likely that if ever this case was to go to Court, you would either lose or make an arrangement out of court that would force you to shut up about it and give them the dupes in return of compensation. But your claim is legit as it's not an isolated mistake but rather it was done purposely, and also because the plate itself and the Upper Deck checklists state the plate should be a 1/1 (regardless if every plate was unique and a 1/1 by themselves, the checklist claims there should only be one of each plate).
Anyway it will be interesting to see how this develops.