E
es_19
Guest
jan hlavac to nashville, tampa picks up a 7th rounder
The Leafs did some good but I think getting rid of Kilger is a mistake he is a big hitter and can scare other teams
Does anyone else think that the Leafs had a rather good trade deadline day? They've cut out almost 4 million bucks in salary, and will probably shave another 2m off by cutting Razor in the off season? With all those vets ... rebuilding starts here.
Julian
As for Vancouver not dealing, why?!
Julian
I will with-hold comments as to not offend the highly sensitive Cooke fans. :dizzy:
Impressive, that must have been really really really hard to do.I will with-hold comments as to not offend the highly sensitive Cooke fans. :dizzy:
Much appreciated![]()
OK I couldn't bite my tongue anymore. All I will say is, Vancouver must like Burrows more then Cooke. Younger, cheaper, more upside? However, if you want to make serious playoff runs, you need a guy like Cooke. The refs are much more leniant in the playoffs, and as much as I hate to say it Cooke ALWAYS gave everything he had in the playoffs. Not that he didn't in the regular season, but he seemed to really pick it up in the playoffs and on some nights was the best Canuck on the ice. I bet Minnesota fans are very happy they don't have to deal with him anymore.
There, I was nice to Cooke, maybe I am just happy he is out East now. I know what it's like to lose a fan or personal favorite, so I can sympathize with Canuck fans.
That weeping sound you hear is Lionel tearing his hair out...
I'm in the belief that too many times Vancouver has been poised, even in the pre-cap era to make a decent run at the cup, but they have refused to make use of the trade deadline. It's true that they'll have more cap space next year - why not take a rental this year and make a real run for something whilst they still have the talent that they do? The summer is not exactly ridden with talent either. Let's not forget that what the Canucks need right now, is depth on the front lines - another top 6 forward. Considering that this summer we will be arguably losing two (Naslund - he probably won't re-sign for less than 4.5-5M and Morrison - he probably won't re-sign for the levels that the Canucks want him to either), why did we not take a chance and take someone like Ryder who's contract runs out in the summer? There are of course, complications in working out a deal and the like, but it irks me to see that the Canucks seemingly made no real effort to actively recruit, yet again. I can't think of a significant trade deadline deal that improved their chances in the current year for a long time running, with the exception of the 2000 trade that brought over Morrison. Whether or not Morrison was envisaged to produce the kind of chemistry that he did over the next two years with Naslund and Bertuzzi is questionable too.
Julian
Hmmmm, interesting but I have no idea who that may be. By the way, it's good to have a decent conversation. Hopefully we can put that bogus from a couple weeks ago behind us. YGPM as well.cooker - I have a feeling a certain GM will be extending an invitation this offseason to a certain undrafted Vancouver Giant who may be an even harder hitter then Cooke. He doesn't have the offensive skills of Cooke, but he can probably make the team as a fourth line banger that will quickly climb the charts of the NHL's most hated. :dizzy: