according to other site panini joins the NHL License

Very good points by both above posts. I too hope we see a return to some of the unique concepts introduced by some of the brands that Panini has inherited -- because in terms of creativity in card design, ITG and UD have done very little to impress me in recent years.
 
I am glad the exclusive is over and am interested to see what Panini can bring to the hobby. I'm glad UD is still around as I will always put together a UD1 set.

I will still buy ITG stuff license or not.
 
This eventually puts us right back to where we were. In a market where supply already exceeds demand, we add more supply on the supposition that demand will follow (by choosing a multi-national corporation with 'known' brands/name recognition). Tons of products which will ultimately commoditize the market and drive values down. Unless, they have yet to tell us that there be a component of the license which limits the number of releases from year-to-year and that the number of brands a manufacturer can release from year-to-year is based on performance (could happen, I guess). That challenge would breed competition for market share and generate product innovation, etc. etc.

Supply already exceeds demand? Really? If that was true, why do prices increase? The newest product - Champs is already up $7 from the distributor. Sure, you can buy year old product or 2 year old product at a reduced rate off the secondary market - but UD made it's money. Someone bought the product.

Until that revelation comes out, I stand by what I said... Panini and UD will not compete, but rather coexist. They will both produce and collectors will 'choose'... but not which to buy. Collectors will be forced (by their own budget constraints) to choose how they purchase the cards they want.

Successful business' co-exist - they don't compete. Competition is for losers - afterall, in competition, someone loses. Co-exist and flurish. Make the competition your friend. That way everyone makes $$$ and don't kid yourself, it's about $$$, not who has the nicest card.

Disappointing, but understandable when the decision is made by a guy who is judged based on the bottom line of his company (i.e. total revenue of the NHLPA/NHL which probably just went up when he 'doubled' the number of licenses).

That is the entire point of his position - to make $$$ for the organizations, pension funds, operating $$$, etc...

I am not trying to argue - you obviously have a business background or are studying business but the real deal is throwing your money into it and making it work.

I wish there were 16 card shops in my town - then more people would drive to my town to buy sports cards. Short-term loss but long term gain. I would try to get us all under 1 roof or in one section of town. Kind of like the auto-mall theory.

Here's the real kicker. Our friend Dr. Price has thrown his real money into this. We are talking about business, about who wants what. He has an investment as well as a passion to protect. His employees count on that.
 
I am truly sickened that ITG has not been given a license. Both the NHL and the NHLPA have now shown that they do not give a rat's *** about what the collectors want and money is the bottom line. I will continue my support of ITG and the fantastic cards that they have created.
 
Supply already exceeds demand? Really? If that was true, why do prices increase? The newest product - Champs is already up $7 from the distributor. Sure, you can buy year old product or 2 year old product at a reduced rate off the secondary market - but UD made it's money. Someone bought the product.

This is exactly my point. We try and apply the same business principles to six different things and expect it to all mean the same thing. When the factory sells out of a product, we assume that demand met supply... until the distributors and card shops have boxes/cases left 2 years later. Supply > Demand. You're absolutely right, UD made their money and will likely change NOTHING about the product next year because it 'sold out'. Awesome.

Successful business' co-exist - they don't compete. Competition is for losers - afterall, in competition, someone loses. Co-exist and flurish. Make the competition your friend. That way everyone makes $$$ and don't kid yourself, it's about $$$, not who has the nicest card.

Again, this was my original point. Everyone keeps saying they want 'competition', not an exclusive. I call BS. We, as collectors, want 'choices'. Because, you're 100% right, competition (by definition) results in a winner and a loser. That outcome isn't necessary, but... in a limited marketplace, if there is no 'competition', there is also no advancement (I'm not going to make the leap to 'collusion', but really it's not that far away - think of the ads which read 'if you find a lower price elsewhere, we'll match it'). Like I said, Victory will not compete with Score, both will 'sell out', both will get collected, and both will be available for 1/2 price during the 2011-12 season. This is because 'choices' come with a price which isn't always so easy to see at the beginning of the cycle.

I would actually argue that ITG has been in 'competition' with UD for the last 5 years. You really have to 'choose' to buy ITG whereas 'everyone' has UD. This has generated some of the best products which have come out in the last few years (imho). When you stop and think about it, I find it pretty amazing to think that the secondary marked has had slabbed memorabilia cards without player images or NHL insignia sell for prices well above low-numbered, licensed, patch/autos which are supposedly 'more desirable' as officially licensed products. I'd say that's a pretty solid accomplishment for the ITG team.

I am not trying to argue - you obviously have a business background or are studying business but the real deal is throwing your money into it and making it work.

I wish there were 16 card shops in my town - then more people would drive to my town to buy sports cards. Short-term loss but long term gain. I would try to get us all under 1 roof or in one section of town. Kind of like the auto-mall theory.

Here's the real kicker. Our friend Dr. Price has thrown his real money into this. We are talking about business, about who wants what. He has an investment as well as a passion to protect. His employees count on that.

I've got no formal business training, but I am part owner in a couple business ventures, so it's in my best interest to understand what's going on around me economically, so I read a lot (and as a collector, I'm fascinated by the economics of collectibles).

I could go on and on (not trying to argue or sway your opinion, which I pretty much agree with and respect, but because I think it's a fascinating discussion of business practice), but suffice it to say that comparing the secondary market to the card manufacturers is like comparing apples to apple orchards. Secondary market supply is much different than manufacturing supply and secondary market demand is much different than manufacturing demand, but they are inherently linked. This is where I think the frustration begins to mount. When there is a disjoint between the manufacturer and the secondary market, problems will inevitably arise.

Seeing Dr. Price post here, ask for feedback, and listen is one of the primary reasons that I buy ITG (and will continue to do so). He makes it easy for collectors to want to buy ITG cards because he literally shows us all the feedback loop necessary to provide a widely collectible product. When something 'doesn't work', he mans up and says 'sorry, we'll do that better next time.' How can you not respect that? I've sent Allan emails of both praise and criticism on previous releases. I'll do the same after I open my BTP.

I hope you understand what I'm trying to say... I don't have a problem with more manufacturers. I don't have a problem with more choices. I don't have a problem with a little, healthy competition. I take issue with the fact that there is an apparent total disregard for the opinions of the consumer.
 
Personally I think this is one of the worst mistakes the NHL could have made. Panini products are just trash. They have now and always been trash. What the NHL needs to do is give ITG a chance at producing NHL cards. Every hockey collector wants them to.
 
This is exactly my point. We try and apply the same business principles to six different things and expect it to all mean the same thing. When the factory sells out of a product, we assume that demand met supply... until the distributors and card shops have boxes/cases left 2 years later. Supply > Demand. You're absolutely right, UD made their money and will likely change NOTHING about the product next year because it 'sold out'. Awesome.



Again, this was my original point. Everyone keeps saying they want 'competition', not an exclusive. I call BS. We, as collectors, want 'choices'. Because, you're 100% right, competition (by definition) results in a winner and a loser. That outcome isn't necessary, but... in a limited marketplace, if there is no 'competition', there is also no advancement (I'm not going to make the leap to 'collusion', but really it's not that far away - think of the ads which read 'if you find a lower price elsewhere, we'll match it'). Like I said, Victory will not compete with Score, both will 'sell out', both will get collected, and both will be available for 1/2 price during the 2011-12 season. This is because 'choices' come with a price which isn't always so easy to see at the beginning of the cycle.





I've got no formal business training, but I am part owner in a couple business ventures, so it's in my best interest to understand what's going on around me economically, so I read a lot (and as a collector, I'm fascinated by the economics of collectibles).

I could go on and on (not trying to argue or sway your opinion, which I pretty much agree with and respect, but because I think it's a fascinating discussion of business practice), but suffice it to say that comparing the secondary market to the card manufacturers is like comparing apples to apple orchards. Secondary market supply is much different than manufacturing supply and secondary market demand is much different than manufacturing demand, but they are inherently linked. This is where I think the frustration begins to mount. When there is a disjoint between the manufacturer and the secondary market, problems will inevitably arise.



I hope you understand what I'm trying to say... I don't have a problem with more manufacturers. I don't have a problem with more choices. I don't have a problem with a little, healthy competition. I take issue with the fact that there is an apparent total disregard for the opinions of the consumer.



I agree with most of the post. I dont bust any more wax except exquisite but thats me. I think the board is pro ITG (thats ok) and Dr. Price is great at listening to your concerns. I hoped he would get the right to produce rookies and have NHL logos. I dont think the NHL or PA are concerned about collectors as if they ask UD the products are sold out at factory level and thats what they get the money from not secondary market. Unless you see a Coke like revolt with lots and i mean lots of product not sold, i do not think anyting will change.

Ps Dr.Price would love to see many many more cut autos, b/c you have a lot of them no one else does.
 
I am truly sorry for Dr. Price and his team. From ensuring the Rookie redemptions were made for all the collectors in 2003 and for year after year of fantastic products and customer service I am truly thankful to you and ITG. It is a shame the NHLPA cannot see what a license for this company would do.
 
Good thread Jason
I would have liked to see ITG get the deal as well as i like to collect the new rookies. I love the ITG brands and was huge supporter post lock-out with my all time favorite set being Parkhurst Rookie. I still devot my Yzerman collection to only ITG as they are by far the nicest peices out there. They also display very nicely. I'm glad UD has a new compitition as i was getting sick of there repeated sets and staleness. I used to love Ultimate till they changed the box format and diluted the boxes. Oh well maybe Panini will suprise us all, we can only hope.
 
With respect to going to Panini, not sure if that is in my nature, going to someone with hat in hand looking for some type of relationship. Rather be my own man and do what I can do. What do you think?

Sometimes the art needs to take precedence over the artist.

I totally get what you're saying, but if you retained creative control then the expectation would be that you'd be able to do what you can and more. There may be some unique synergies at play here.

With that said, I'd rather the NHL & NHLPA just come to their senses and grant you the licence you deserve.
 
Bittersweet news to say the least. I am thrilled UD has competition and I am really hoping Panini comes out with a couple of good sets with a good rookie crop. I will have no problems switching to Panini cards for my rookie collecting if they can do that.

I was really hoping ITG got a license as well. They really deserved it :(

Who wants to bet that all UD redemptions will be fullfilled(and then some) before September. Not to mention we will probably see a dramatic increase in their customer service.
 
With projected less than stellar rookie classes coming up, the possibility of watered down product and too much product in general I'm starting to think this hobby may have run it's course with me again...maybe its time to start spending money on useful things again!
 
While I'm happy the exclusive is gone, I'm not happy the way it went down. Would have much rather had ITG take the other position over Panini. I won't shoot down Panini until I see what they put out though. I am also glad UD is still in the mix, I probly would have stopped collecting if they were out.

Dr. Price- I do think it's a pretty smart idea to talk to Panini and work under them!
 
less than stellar? must not be a habs fan ;)

As for me, I will avoid Panini if their product is anything like their basketball stuff.

No autos of legends...
No hardsigned autos...

Why would I want their stuff over ITG or UD?
 
While I am disappointed that ITG did not get a license as well; however, I am looking forward to seeing the return of Pacific brands (hopefully). I am a parallel guy, and always liked the chase of different parallels. At least there isn't an exclusive.
 
There seems to be a lot of prejudice against Panini. I say we give them a chance as we would any other new hockey card manufacturer. I'll be keeping an open mind in August.
 
Hey I am very glad the exclusive is over. Maybe Upper deck will do a better job now that have competition.

I do think Panini is not going to work in todays economy. If they are going to do nothing but stickers and sticker autos judging from basketball, that won't fly in my opinion!
 
said Richard McWilliam, Upper Deck’s Founder and CEO. “Since 2005, through its exclusive partnership with the NHLPA and the NHL, Upper Deck has taken the category and Upper Deck’s hockey brands to unimaginable levels.

You got that right, tricky Di ck...
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
390,147
Messages
2,238,869
Members
4,169
Latest member
Misso
Back
Top